. 2022 Jul 22;1-10.
doi: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0094. Online ahead of print.
Comparison of Sensorimotor Integration and Skill-Related Physical Fitness Components Between College Athletes With and Without Forward Head Posture
- PMID: 35894888
- DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2022-0094
Objective: To evaluate sensorimotor integration and skill-related physical fitness components for participants with forward head posture (FHP) compared with strictly matched controls with normal head alignment.
Material and methods: We measured FHP, sensorimotor processing, and skill-related physical fitness variables in 50 participants with FHP and in 50 participants matched for age, gender, and body mass index with normal FHP, defined as having a craniovertebral angle >55°. Sensorimotor processing and integration variables were: (1) amplitudes of the spinal N13, (2) brainstem P14, (3) parietal N20 and P27, and (4) frontal N30 potentials. The skill-related physical fitness variables selected for the study were (1) T-test agility, (2) leg power, (3) stork static balance test, and (4) Y-balance test.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the FHP group and control group for the sensorimotor integration variable: frontal N30 potentials (P < .05). Additionally, between-group differences were found for the sensorimotor processing variables: amplitudes of spinal N13, brainstem P14, and parietal N20, and P27 (P < .05). Statistically significant differences between groups for the skill-related physical fitness variables were also identified: T-test agility, leg power, stork static balance test, and Y-balance test (P < .05). The magnitude of the craniovertebral angle showed a correlation with all measured variables (P < .05).
Conclusion: College athletes with FHP exhibited altered sensorimotor processing and integration measurements and less efficient skill-related physical fitness compared with athletes with normal sagittal head posture alignment.
Keywords: agility; balance; cervical sagittal alignment; power; sensorimotor control.
Is forward head posture relevant to autonomic nervous system function and cervical sensorimotor control? Cross sectional study.Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Jan 7.PMID: 31955048
Demonstration of central conduction time and neuroplastic changes after cervical lordosis rehabilitation in asymptomatic subjects: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 28;11(1):15379. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94548-z.PMID: 34321539 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Evaluating Differences Between Participants With Various Forward Head Posture With and Without Postural Neck Pain Using Craniovertebral Angle and Forward Shoulder Angle.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Mar-Apr;45(3):179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jul 25.PMID: 35902274
Increased forward head posture and restricted cervical range of motion in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;39(9):658-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3058.PMID: 19721213
The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):562-577. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09594-y.PMID: 31773477 Free PMC article. Review.